User Contributed Notes Workflow Transitions |
|
nteeuwen@hotmail.com 13-Dec-2005 10:15 |
#768
|
Can anyone tell me how the default statuses are to be used?
New -> feedback -> acknowledged->confirmed->assigned->resolved->closed
New - pretty obvious
Assigned - developer ready to fix the bug
Resolved - developer resolved the bug
Closed - If the developer fixed the bug, a tester has confirmed it and closed the issue. There are other scenarious for this but this would be the primary one.
I am not quite sure where feedback, acknowledged and confirmed fit in.
I would think feedback would be something a developer might set the bug to if they need feed back from the reporter on the issue. |
|
dcw@infonie.fr 13-Dec-2005 11:59 |
#770
|
| I think that "feedback" is to be used when the developper wants more information (or explanation) about the bug |
|
bart.veldhuizen@nuon.com 11-Jan-2006 8:46 |
#821
|
We use 'acknowledged' to confirm that a new issues has been reviewed and that it is indeed a bug and that it contains enough information to be reproduced/analysed. However, at this time we will not start work on it.
Once we start a new release and the issue needs to be addressed (in this release), its status will change to 'confirmed'.
Once an issue gets assigned to a developer, he is expected to work on it ASAP. So we will never have developers that have hundreds of issues assigned to them.
Cheers,
Bart |
|
teo.nomail@noplace 24-May-2006 18:13 |
#1089
|
Hi to all
Do you know if it is possible to edit the default name for the WF steps?
I'd like to change them to include some testing phase ... something like:
NEW REQUEST -> DEVELOPING -> MOVE TO TEST ENV -> USER TEST -> MOVE TO PROD -> UPDATE MANAULS.
Thanks in advance |
|
nicolas.ng.gauthier@alcatel.fr 08-Aug-2006 9:23 |
#1216
|
==> any update on this ? I also would like to understand if the default WF steps can be:
1) renamed
2) modified
Thanks !
Hi to all
Do you know if it is possible to edit the default name for the WF steps?
I'd like to change them to include some testing phase ... something like:
NEW REQUEST -> DEVELOPING -> MOVE TO TEST ENV -> USER TEST -> MOVE TO PROD -> UPDATE MANAULS. |
|
n/a 18-Aug-2006 0:33 |
#1240
|
Dear all,
I am evaluating and also interested to know how the workflow be customized to suit my company needs. Besides, what would be impacts on future upgrade if the workflow has been customized?
Thank you.
Regards,
Francis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Last updated: Fri, 16 May 2008 - 11:23:42 |
|