| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-05-24 02:30 EDT |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Wiki | ManTweet | Repositories |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Wiki ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0004161 | mantisbt | relationships | public | 2004-07-21 07:39 | 2004-08-29 02:10 | ||||
| Reporter | vboctor | ||||||||
| Assigned To | masc | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | ||||
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
| Product Version | 0.19.0a2 | ||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 0.19.0rc1 | |||||||
| Summary | 0004161: Relations to private issues must only appear to user with appropriate access level | ||||||||
| Description | If a public issue is linked to a private one, and a user with only access to view public ones, the relations section shows the issue id of the private issue but not the status or the summary. In this case the relationship should not appear at all. Ideally, the history should also not show this relation, but that is not possible with the current implementation of history (so I would treat this as a different issue since it also applies to issue like private notes, ...etc.) | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Attached Files |  relationship_api_4161_4146_patch.zip [^] (4,577 bytes) 2004-07-29 12:25 | ||||||||
 Relationships |
 Notes |
|
 (0006208)masc (developer) 2004-07-21 07:59 |
Victor, I'm sure this is the right solution. Although the related bug is private, the relationship exists. So I list the relationship because it's present, but with no information because the user can't have access (the meaning is "there is a relationship but you are not grant to access to it"). If you prefer I can easly implement your proposal hidding the line. |
 (0006209)vboctor (administrator) 2004-07-21 08:21 |
"private" things (whether notes / relationships) are not to be visible (even in terms of existence, not just contents) to users without the appropriate access level. This is part of the privacy of being private! Also your current solution may be confusing to some users (for example, see last note in 0003948). |
|
(0006213) masc (developer) 2004-07-21 08:42 |
Now it's clear. I'm going to update the API. |
|
(0006216) masc (developer) 2004-07-21 10:12 |
Fixed. See patch attached. The relationship line is skipped if the user is not grant to view the related bug |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2004-07-21 07:39 | vboctor | New Issue | |
| 2004-07-21 07:59 | masc | Note Added: 0006208 | |
| 2004-07-21 08:21 | vboctor | Note Added: 0006209 | |
| 2004-07-21 08:42 | masc | Note Added: 0006213 | |
| 2004-07-21 10:11 | masc | File Added: relationship_api_fix.zip | |
| 2004-07-21 10:12 | masc | Note Added: 0006216 | |
| 2004-07-29 12:23 | masc | File Deleted: relationship_api_fix.zip | |
| 2004-07-29 12:25 | masc | File Added: relationship_api_4161_4146_patch.zip | |
| 2004-08-02 06:01 | vboctor | Status | new => resolved |
| 2004-08-02 06:01 | vboctor | Fixed in Version | => 0.19.0rc1 |
| 2004-08-02 06:01 | vboctor | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2004-08-08 09:31 | jlatour | Relationship added | has duplicate 0004290 |
| 2004-08-29 02:10 | vboctor | Status | resolved => closed |
|
Issue History |
| MantisBT 1.2.16dev master-1.2.x-8c2bd07 [^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2013 MantisBT Team
Time: 0.1126 seconds. memory usage: 2,804 KB |
|