View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0020286 | mantisbt | javascript | public | 2015-11-18 06:02 | 2016-07-19 04:19 |
Reporter | atrol | Assigned To | syncguru | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | block | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Target Version | 2.0.0-beta.1 | Fixed in Version | 2.0.0-beta.1 | ||
Summary | 0020286: Missing JavaScript libraries | ||||
Description | JavaScript functionality is broken with default installation ($g_cdn_enabled = OFF;) jquery-1.11.3.min.js and jquery-ui-1.11.4.min.js have to be added to | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Sounds good @atrol |
|
@atrol The PR is updated with latest merges. One of those covers disabled CDN scenario with the local copy of the following files: jquery-2.1.4.min.js jquery-ui-1.11.4.min.css Is there a reason we still want to use the older version of JQuery? |
|
We should discuss this with other developers. Dont't forget to change "Internet Explorer 6 and above" at [1] if the descision is to use the new version. |
|
Reminder sent to: dregad, rombert, vboctor Thoughts? |
|
We are about to release 1.3, if someone doesn't want to move to the modern world, they can use that. In the following version with modern UI, we need to modernize our dependencies and stack to be able to innovate. As for IE 8, Microsoft is dropping its support completely. See the following articles for some details about their support plans: |
|
For 1.3, we need to keep compatibility with older browsers. Microsoft ending support for IE8 does not necessarily mean that it's no longer used in the field, especially in corporate environments. I agree with going for latest jQuery versions in 2.x. |
|
Agree - for 1.3 we should not introduce new jquery library ... it is very lightly used by classic UI. |
|
+1 |
|